Defense Audit
72-Hour DeliveryFor companies responding to ADA website accessibility lawsuits.
- Validates or refutes plaintiff claims
- Litigation-ready evidence package
- Video proof of accessibility testing
- Expert witness support available
We test your website the way blind users actually experience it. Real screen reader navigation, not just automated code scanning. Get results in 72 hours.
Tell us about your situation and we'll respond within one business day.
The Problem
Code scanners find missing labels and contrast issues. But they cannot show you a blind user getting trapped in a cookie modal, unable to dismiss it. They cannot prove your checkout actually works. Our reports include full static scan results alongside video evidence of real screen reader navigation.
4,000+
ADA website lawsuits filed annually
$20K
Average settlement cost
Zero
Transactions tested by static scanners
How It Works
Our system navigates your website exactly like a blind user would, using real screen reader software. Every report combines static analysis results with video evidence of actual screen reader testing.
Our system uses actual VoiceOver screen reader software to navigate your site. No DOM simulation or code analysis. We experience your site the way real users do.
We prove that critical flows actually work: checkouts, logins, forms, and multi-step processes. These are the issues static scanners cannot test.
Human accessibility specialists review all findings. Every report includes actionable fixes with code examples and priority rankings.
The Technology
Our testing system is purpose-built to navigate websites exactly as a blind person would, using real screen reader software.
Services
Whether responding to legal action or proactively ensuring compliance, we have a solution for your needs.
For companies responding to ADA website accessibility lawsuits.
Win government and enterprise contracts with certified documentation.
Prove your critical user flows work for everyone.
Get a free consultation to discuss your accessibility needs. We respond within one business day.
Compare Approaches
Static scanners are fast but shallow. Manual audits are thorough but slow and expensive. Sentium delivers the best of both.
This table compares three accessibility testing approaches. May require horizontal scrolling on smaller screens.
| Capability | Static Scanners | Manual Audits | Sentium |
|---|---|---|---|
| Testing Method | Scans code patterns | Human testers navigate site | i11y uses real screen readers |
| Screen Reader Testing | Estimated from code | Manual, varies by tester | Real VoiceOver, every test |
| Transaction Flows | Cannot test | Tested but time-intensive | Automated end-to-end verification |
| WCAG Coverage | 30 to 40% of criteria | Depends on auditor expertise | Functional criteria focus |
| Delivery Time | Instant | 2 to 4 weeks | 72 hours |
| Cost | Low (often free) | High ($5,000+) | Fraction of manual audit cost |
| Evidence Format | Code snippets and rule IDs | Written reports | Video + written report |
Questions
Automated scanners like Axe, WAVE, or Lighthouse analyze code patterns and can catch about 30 to 40% of accessibility issues. We include these static scan results in every report, but we go further: the i11y system uses a real screen reader (VoiceOver) to navigate your site exactly like a blind user would. This lets us verify that checkout flows, forms, and navigation actually work in practice, and provide video evidence of the experience.
i11y is a proprietary accessibility testing system that Sentium uses exclusively. Unlike tools that simulate screen readers, i11y operates actual VoiceOver software, receiving only audio output and sending only keyboard commands. This produces authentic evidence of what blind users actually experience.
Standard delivery is 72 hours. For urgent situations, contact us and we'll work with your timeline.
You receive a comprehensive report that includes: full static scan results (code-level issues like missing labels, contrast problems), functional testing findings from real screen reader navigation, WCAG criteria mapping, severity rankings, and actionable fix recommendations with code examples. All audits include video evidence showing the actual screen reader experience. VPAT deliverables follow the ITI VPAT 2.4 format accepted by federal procurement.
Yes. Our Defense Audit reports are specifically designed for litigation support. They include video evidence of screen reader testing, timestamped findings, and can validate or refute specific plaintiff claims. Expert witness support is available if needed.
Our VPATs follow the ITI VPAT 2.4 format and include WCAG 2.1 Level AA conformance testing with detailed remarks for each criterion. This is the format accepted by US federal procurement and most enterprise procurement processes.
Yes. After an initial audit, we can set up ongoing monitoring to catch regressions as your site evolves. This is especially valuable for development teams shipping frequent updates. Contact us for custom monitoring packages.
Ready to prove your digital products work for everyone? Send us a message and we'll respond within one business day.
Responding to a lawsuit? Include your case details, we prioritize urgent requests.
Email us directly and we'll respond within one business day.